Teacher Evaluation: WHY It Matters and HOW We Can Do Better
An in-depth look...
ESSA requires districts to adopt a systematic approach for data-based decision-making to enable a rapid response to students’ needs. As a result, many district leaders are considering or re-validating RTI/MTSS models.
Yet, these frameworks are infamously complex with many stakeholders and moving parts, and can be tricky to implement – and maintain – with fidelity.
“MTSS not only focuses on meeting students’ academic needs, inherent within RTI, but in addition addresses the social, emotional and behavioral development of children,” notes Jo Ann Hanrahan, Director of the Frontline Research and Learning Institute.
Given these complexities and ESSA’s focus on agile, data-based student support, how do administrators and educators feel about current RTI/MTSS efforts in their districts? What changes need to be made?
Findings from a recent Frontline Education survey shed some light.
52% of survey respondents have their doubts that students are being placed in the right #RTI / #MTSS tier. How does this impact teacher effectiveness?
While results show that school staff are confident in their ability to identify struggling learners, 52% said they have their doubts or are not confident that students are being placed in the right Tier. And 59% reported they have their doubts or are not confident that their school’s Data Analysis Team consistently enforces valid entry and exit criteria for Tiers 2/3.
Could this lack of confidence be related to gaps in a district’s RTI/MTSS training procedures? And, if staff lack confidence in the process, how does that impact student outcomes?
Consider how RTI/MTSS stakeholders in your district would respond to these questions. If, like 63% of survey respondents, RTI/MTSS-focused trainings are only sporadic in your district, think about how integrating district-wide best practices can help raise staff buy-in of your RTI/MTSS efforts.